ALAALI OPTIMAL LEVERAGE MODEL (ALOM): A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR CAPITAL STRUCTURE OPTIMIZATION

Authors

  • Hasan Mohamed Husain Alaali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61421/IJSSMER.2026.4502

Keywords:

Alaali Optimal Leverage Model (ALOM), capital structure, optimal leverage, dynamic leverage, stochastic optimization, default risk, systemic risk, earnings volatility

Abstract

Introduction: Capital structure decisions require firms to balance the financial benefits of debt against default exposure, earnings volatility, liquidity pressure, and changing macro-financial conditions. Although existing capital structure research incorporates dynamic adjustment, default risk, and macroeconomic effects, an opportunity remains for an integrated benefit–risk structure that determines optimal leverage as financial and systemic conditions evolve.

Methods: This study develops the Alaali Optimal Leverage Model (ALOM) as a theoretical and mathematical capital structure model. ALOM begins with a general benefit–risk formulation and develops this logic within a stochastic firm-value setting incorporating continuous volatility, jump risk, leverage-dependent default exposure, and systemic-risk costs. The general dynamic optimization problem is formalized through a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) structure. Under explicitly simplifying assumptions, including the exclusion of jump risk, a reduced-form leverage target and partial-adjustment mechanism are specified separately to represent gradual convergence toward a condition-dependent target. The model is examined through comparative statics, numerical illustration, and illustrative financial scenarios.

Results: The theoretical results indicate that the attractiveness of leverage increases with the economic benefits of debt and decreases as earnings volatility, systemic risk, and expected distress costs increase. Under the simplified no-jump specification, the leverage target decreases with volatility and distress costs, while the partial-adjustment mechanism predicts gradual rather than instantaneous convergence toward that target when adjustment frictions are present. The full stochastic specification additionally captures the effect of discontinuous systemic shocks on leverage decisions. Illustrative scenarios demonstrate the directional implications of changing benefit–risk configurations rather than empirically calibrated optimal leverage estimates.

Discussion: ALOM conceptualizes optimal leverage as a condition-dependent and dynamically adjustable financial position rather than a permanently fixed target. The simplified leverage target and adjustment path represent a restricted analytical specification and are not presented as the general closed-form solution to the full stochastic HJB problem. ALOM provides a theoretically testable foundation for subsequent firm-level calibration, empirical validation, and comparison with established capital structure models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hasan Mohamed Husain Alaali

DFAS Research Center, Kingdom of Bahrain

References

Alaali, H. M. H. (2025). Alaali Corporate Financial Model (ACFM): A holistic approach to corporate financial health assessment. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5179805

Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2002). Market timing and capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00414

Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2002). Testing trade-off and pecking order predictions about dividends and debt. The Review of Financial Studies, 15(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.1.1

Flannery, M. J., & Rangan, K. P. (2006). Partial adjustment toward target capital structures. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(3), 469–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.03.004

Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009). Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important? Financial Management, 38(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01026.x

Goldstein, R., Ju, N., & Leland, H. (2001). An EBIT-based model of dynamic capital structure. The Journal of Business, 74(4), 483–512. https://doi.org/10.1086/322893

Graham, J. R., & Leary, M. T. (2011). A review of empirical capital structure research and directions for the future. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 3, 309–345. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-102710-144821

Hackbarth, D., Miao, J., & Morellec, E. (2006). Capital structure, credit risk, and macroeconomic conditions. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 519–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.10.003

Hennessy, C. A., & Whited, T. M. (2005). Debt dynamics. The Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1129–1165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00758.x

Ju, N., Parrino, R., Poteshman, A. M., & Weisbach, M. S. (2005). Horses and rabbits? Optimal dynamic capital structure from shareholder and manager perspectives. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(2), 259–281.

Korajczyk, R. A., & Levy, A. (2003). Capital structure choice: Macroeconomic conditions and financial constraints. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(1), 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00249-0

Leland, H. E. (1994). Corporate debt value, bond covenants, and optimal capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 49(4), 1213–1252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb02452.x

Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.

Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 575–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03646.x

Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure? Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421–1460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05184.x

Strebulaev, I. A., & Whited, T. M. (2012). Dynamic models and structural estimation in corporate finance. Foundations and Trends® in Finance, 6(1–2), 1–163. https://doi.org/10.1561/0500000035

Alaali, H. M. H. (2025a). The DFAS-FEP Protocol: A Global Governance Standard for Responsible AI Use and Authorship Integrity in Financial Modelling. DOI: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5260517

Alaali, H. M. H. (2025b). DFAS-EEP: Editorial Ethics Protocol for Governance Integrity in Scientific Publishing. SSRN. DOI: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5375339

Downloads

Published

2026-09-18

How to Cite

Hasan Mohamed Husain Alaali. (2026). ALAALI OPTIMAL LEVERAGE MODEL (ALOM): A STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR CAPITAL STRUCTURE OPTIMIZATION. International Journal of Social Science, Management and Economics Research, 4(5), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.61421/IJSSMER.2026.4502