EVALUATING DEPENDENCY AND NEOCLASSICAL THEORIES IN EXPLAINING WEALTH INEQUALITIES THROUGH THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE (BRI) AND ANTI-DUMPING POLICY IN ASEAN COUNTRIES

Authors

  • Anthika Manowong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61421/IJSSMER.2025.3302

Keywords:

BRI, Anti-dumping, Weak State, Geopolitic, ASEAN

Abstract

The study examines ASEAN's economic transformations since China's Belt and Road Initiative (2013), revealing complex regional responses to global economic pressures. ASEAN countries demonstrate varied approaches to trade defense, with some implementing anti-dumping measures against Chinese commodities while others remain passive. The research highlights the tension between protecting domestic industries and managing global economic integration, showing how different ASEAN nations balance macroeconomic interests, microeconomic challenges, and geopolitical positioning across diverse economic strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Anthika Manowong

Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages, Taiwan

References

Alexandre, D., & Grace, S. (2024). Mind the gap: Ambition versus delivery in China’s BRI mega projects in Southeast Asia. Lowy Institute. Retrieved from [https://interactives.lowyinstitute.org/features/mind-the-gap-chinas-bri-southeast-asia/DAYANT-STANHOPE-Mind-the-gap.pdf]

Ang, C. G. (2016). China’s influence over Vietnam in war and peace. In E. Goh (Ed.), Rising China's Influence in Developing Asia. Oxford University Press. [https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198758518.003.0004]

Arif, M. (2021). Balancing with Jokowi’s Characteristics: A Neoclassical Realism Approach to Indonesia’s Foreign and Security Policies in the South China Sea. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 8, 370–390.

Baviera, A. S., & Arugay, A. A. (2021). The Philippines’ Shifting Engagement with China’s Belt and Road Initiative: The Politics of Duterte’s Legitimation. Asian Perspective, 45, 277–300.

Bolesta, A. (2018). Myanmar-China peculiar relationship: Trade, investment, and the model of development. Journal of International Studies, 11(2), 23–36. [https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2018/11-2/2]

Caitlin, C., & Nargiza, S. (2016). South China Sea arbitration ruling: What happened and what’s next? U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Retrieved from [https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/Research/Issue%20Brief_South%20China%20Sea%20Arbitration%20Ruling%20What%20Happened%20and%20What%27s%20Next071216.pdf]

Christie, Ø. S., Jakobsen, J., & Jakobsen, T. G. (2024). The US way or Huawei? An analysis of the positioning of secondary states in the US-China rivalry. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 29, 77–108. [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-023-09858-y]

Cora, J. (2024). De-risking ASEAN as an option. Global Europe. Retrieved from [https://globaleurope.eu/europes-future/de-risking-asean-as-an-option/]

Cruz De Castro, R. (2018). Explaining the Duterte Administration’s Appeasement Policy on China: The Power of Fear. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 45, 165–191.

Cruz De Castro, R. (2020). The limits of intergovernmentalism: The Philippines’ changing strategy in the South China Sea dispute and its impact on ASEAN. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39(3). [https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420935562]

Dayant, A., & Stanhope, S. (2024). Mind the gap: Ambition versus delivery in China’s BRI mega projects in Southeast Asia. Lowy Institute. Retrieved from [https://interactives.lowyinstitute.org/features/mind-the-gap-chinas-bri-southeast-asia/DAYANT-STANHOPE-Mind-the-gap.pdf]

Devlaeminck, D. J. (2018). The Legal Principle of Reciprocity and China’s Water Treaty Practice. Chinese Journal of Environmental Law.

Edgar, P. (2017). Vietnam’s industrialization ambitions: The case of Vung Ang Economic Zone (ISEAS Perspective No. 66). ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute. Retrieved from [https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/ISEAS_Perspective_2017_66.pdf]

Fang, S., & Li, X. (2022). Southeast Asia under great-power competition: Public opinion about hedging in the Philippines. Journal of East Asian Studies, 22(3), 481–501. [https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2022.35]

Fukuda‐Parr, S., & Shiga, H. (2016). Normative Framing of Development Cooperation: Japanese Bilateral Aid between the DAC and Southern Donors.

Gerstl, A. (2020). Malaysia’s Hedging Strategy Towards China Under Mahathir Mohamad (2018–2020): Direct Engagement, Limited Balancing, and Limited Bandwagoning. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 49, 106–131.

Greco, A. W. (2022). A Relationship of Pivots: Philippine-US Cooperation in a Changing World. Journal of Strategic Security.

Hai, D. (2021). Vietnam and China: Ideological bedfellows, strange dreamers. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 10, 1–21. [https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2021.1932018]

Hiep, L. H. (2018). The Belt and Road Initiative in Vietnam: Challenges and prospects. ISEAS - Yusof Ishak Institute. Retrieved from [https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/ISEAS_Perspective_2018_18@50.pdf]

Hunter, S. M. (2020). Navigating great power competition: A neoclassical realist view of hedging. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 24(1), 29–63. [https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/article/24/1/29/7043153]

Jisi, W. (2011). China’s search for a grand strategy: A rising great power finds its way. Foreign Affairs, 90(2), 68–79. Retrieved from [http://www.jstor.org/stable/25800458]

Kuik, C.-C. (2008). The essence of hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s response to a rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 30(2), 159–185. [https://doi.org/10.1355/CS30-2A]

Kuik, C. (2021). Laos's Enthusiastic Embrace of China's Belt and Road Initiative. Asian Perspective.

Lauridsen, L. S. (2020). Drivers of China’s Regional Infrastructure Diplomacy: The Case of the Sino-Thai Railway Project. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50, 380–406.

Liu, F. (2020). The recalibration of Chinese assertiveness: China's responses to the Indo-Pacific challenge. International Affairs, 96, 9–27.

Liu, M., Wu, P., & Wu, C. (2020). China’s foreign policy under Xi – reappraisal of China’s partnership diplomacy.

Mannan, M. A. (2020). China’s Balancing Behaviour against the United States and the Special Importance of Myanmar. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 7, 177–201.

Marston, H. S. (2023). Abandoning Hedging: Reconsidering Southeast Asian Alignment Choices. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 45, 55–81.

Milner, A. (2020). Long-term Themes in Malaysian Foreign Policy: Hierarchy Diplomacy, Non-interference and Moral Balance. Asian Studies Review, 44, 117–135.

Miura, K. (2023). Strongman politics and China's foreign policy actors: maritime assertiveness under Xi Jinping. International Affairs.

Miura, K. (2023). Strongman politics and China's foreign policy actors: maritime assertiveness under Xi Jinping. International Affairs.

Mohan, C. (2013). Emerging Geopolitical Trends and Security in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the People's Republic of China, and India (ACI) Region. Asian Development Bank Institute Research Paper Series.

Nguyen, L. D., Tracy Trang, L., Tran, D. C., Tran, A., AnQuoc, L., & Hudson, A. (2022). The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): Opportunities and Risks from Vietnamese Perspective.

Peng, N. (2021). Hedging against the Dragon: Myanmar's Tangled Relationship with China since 1988. Pacific Focus.

Pham, S. T., & Ba, A. D. (2021). Vietnam's Cautious Response to China's Belt and Road Initiative: The Imperatives of Domestic Legitimation. Asian Perspective.

Punyaratabandhu, P., & Swaspitchayaskun, J. (2018). The Political Economy of China–Thailand Development under the One Belt One Road Initiative: Challenges and Opportunities. The Chinese Economy, 51, 333–341.

Putra, B. A. (2020). Comprehending Brunei Darussalam’s vanishing claims in the South China Sea: China’s exertion of economic power and the influence of elite perception. Cogent Social Sciences.

Renato Cruz De Castro. (2020). The limits of intergovernmentalism: The Philippines’ changing strategy in the South China Sea dispute and its impact on ASEAN. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39(3). [https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420935562]

Rubiolo, F., & Aguirre, F. L. (2023). South Korea as a Middle Power in East Asia? World Affairs, 186, 442–468.

Roy, D. (2005). Southeast Asia and China: Balancing or Bandwagoning? Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 27, 305–322.

Sims, K. (2017). Gambling on the future: casino enclaves, development, and poverty alleviation in Laos. Pacific Affairs, 90, 675–699.

Soong, J., & Aung, K. H. (2020). Myanmar’s Perception and Strategy toward China’s BRI Expansion on Three Major Projects Development: Hedging Strategic Framework with State-Market-Society Analysis. The Chinese Economy, 54, 20–34.

Stromseth, J. R. (2019). The Testing Ground: China's Rising Influence in Southeast Asia and Regional Responses.

Syailendra, E. A. (2024). Malaysia's strategic approach: Unpacking the “action-reaction spiral” logic in the South China Sea. Asian Politics & Policy.

Tan, S. S. (2016). America the Indispensable Power: Singapore's Perspective of America as a Security Partner. Asian Politics & Policy, 8, 119–135.

Thayer, C. (2016). Vietnam's strategy of "cooperating and struggling" with China over maritime disputes in the South China Sea. Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, 3, 124–142. [https://doi.org/10.1177/2347797016645453]

Tran, H. X., Hoang, N. T., Nguyen, A. T., Truong, H. Q., & Dong, C. V. (2020). China-ASEAN Trade Relations: A Study of Determinants and Potentials. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7, 209–217.

Trinh, D. V. (2022). South East Asian countries’ policies toward a rising China: lessons from Vietnam’s hedging response to the Belt and Road Initiative. South East Asia Research, 30, 237–254.

Tung, N. C. (2023). Chinese Economic Statecraft in Southeast Asia and Its Uneven Impact in Laos and Cambodia. Issues & Studies.

Vinogradov, I. (2024). The Formation of a Strategic Partnership between China and Thailand: the Role of Belt and Road Initiative. Vostok. Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: istoriia i sovremennost.

Vu, V. H., Soong, J., & Nguyen, K. N. (2022). The Political Economy of Vietnam and Its Development Strategy under China–USA Power Rivalry and Hegemonic Competition: Hedging for Survival. The Chinese Economy, 56, 256–270.

Wong, C. K., Liew, V. K., & Arip, M. A. (2021). The Effects of ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement on Bilateral Trades. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 56, 249–256.

Y. Tong, S., & Yuen Kong, T. (2021). Singapore in China's Belt and Road Initiative. Research Handbook on the Belt and Road Initiative.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-13

How to Cite

Anthika Manowong. (2025). EVALUATING DEPENDENCY AND NEOCLASSICAL THEORIES IN EXPLAINING WEALTH INEQUALITIES THROUGH THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE (BRI) AND ANTI-DUMPING POLICY IN ASEAN COUNTRIES. International Journal of Social Science, Management and Economics Research, 3(3), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.61421/IJSSMER.2025.3302