Democracy as an Impediment to Progress in Developing Countries: Social Constructs versus Realities in Kenya

  • Home   /  Volume 1 Issue 4   /  
  • Democracy as an Impediment to Progress in Developing Countries: Social Constructs versus Realities in Kenya

Democracy as an Impediment to Progress in Developing Countries: Social Constructs versus Realities in Kenya

Comments Off on Democracy as an Impediment to Progress in Developing Countries: Social Constructs versus Realities in Kenya


Frank Ojwang
University of Nairobi, Kenya

DOI – https://doi.org/10.61421/IJSSMER.2023.1401

ABSTRACT

The question as to whether democracy is succeeding or failing in Sub-Saharan Africa since it was introduced by colonial masters and the West requires further interrogation and critical analysis. The enforcement of democracy is paradoxically observed in the tactfully woven governance system led by surrogate ‘whitened’ African colonialists that extend the colonial mission. The fruits of democracy remain elusive to the developing countries like Kenya, with only a handful of privileged Kenyans benefiting in reality. This paper analyses the social constructs of democracy in developing countries like Kenya using content analysis of 66 open access SCOPUS indexed journals between 1961-2023 and deconstructs the nuances of democracy using bibliometric analysis of 381 SCOPUS indexed articles to illuminate the hidden but harsh realities of the failing democracy as implemented in Kenya. This is a phenomenological analysis that seeks to relay perspectives and behaviors based on the experiences and observation by the researcher. A section of African researchers have questioned the efficacy of democracy as a form of governance in Kenya. The researcher analyses the Kenyan historical epochs from 1900 to 2022 using historical analysis method and as a basis for proving that democracy as implemented is ineffective and inefficient for achieving statehood and equitable development. The paper uses qualitative methods to debunk the fallacy that democracy works in developing countries like Kenya using facts and realities. The article argues that the epistemological injustice presents the systemic research gap as knowledge continues to be a reserve for the knowers that form the majority that set the standards for education globally. This paper uses democratic theory and secondary data sources to analyse whether democracy is the right foundation of the governance system for developing countries in Sub Sahara Africa where the countries have multiethnic societies that have historically had different cultural practices.

Key words: Democracy, Ethnography, Governance, Kenya, Reality, Social constructs

References

  • African Development Bank. (2023). African Economic Outlook 2023. Abidjan: African Development Bank.
  • Barkan, J. (2013). Kenya’s 2013 Elections: Technology Is Not Democracy’. Journal of Democracy, 156-165.
  • Bartelett, B. R. (1990). Capitalism in Africa: A survey. The Journal of Developing Areas, 327-350.
  • Beck, A. (1966). Colonial Policy and Education in British East Africa, 1900-1950. Journal of British Studies, 115-138.
  • Chan, S. (2019). FREE AND FAIR? Observation of Selected African Elections . Journal of African Elections, 1-22.
  • Cheeseman, N., & Sishuwa, S. (2021). Is multi-party democracy the best form of governance in African countries? African Studies Review, 1-29.
  • Cheeseman, N., Matfess, H., & Amani, A. (2021). Tanzania: The Roots of Repression. Journal of Democracy, 77-89.
  • Corigan, T. (2023, Feb 01). Research publications. Retrieved from https://gga.org/africas-presidents-and-the-term-limit-controversy/: https://gga.org/africas-presidents-and-the-term-limit-controversy/
  • Electoral Commission of Uganda. (2022, Feb 04). Final Results. Retrieved from The Electoral Commission: https://www.ec.or.ug/ecresults/2021/Summary_PRESIDENT_FINAL_2021.pdf
  • Gwaravanda, E. T. (2020). An Epistemological Critique of the African University Education System. In G. P. Jr., Education Systems Around the World (p. 10.5772/intechopen.85879. ).
  • Jones, B. G. (2005). Africa and the Poverty of International Relations. Third World Quarterly, 987-1003.
  • Kaburu, M. K. (2022). An Assessment of Kenya’s 2017 Election. Journal of African Elections, 44-69.
  • Kisaka, M. O., & Nyadera, I. N. (2019). Ethnicity and Politics in Kenya’s Turbulent Path to Democracy and Development. Journal of Social Policy Conferences, 159-180.
  • Kivuva, J. (2023, Feb 01). Kenya’s benefit-less democratisation. Great Insights Magazine, pp. https://ecdpm.org/work/rising-voices-in-africa-volume-4-issue-3-april-may-2015/kenyas-benefit-less-democratisation.
  • Louw-Vaudran, L. (2023, Feb 2). Election observation in Africa put to the test. Retrieved from Institute for Security Studies: https://issafrica.org/iss-today/election-observation-in-africa-put-to-the-test
  • Mackatiani, C., Imbovah, M., Imbova, N., & Gakungai, D. (2016). Development of Education in Kenya: Influence of the Political Factor Beyond 2015 Mdgs. Journal of Education and Practice, 55-60.
  • Makara, S. (2020). Presidential Term Limits in Uganda: Do Elections Provide an Avenue for Alternate Power Succession? In J. R. Mangala, The Politics of Challenging Presidential Term Limits in Africa (pp. 105-137). NY: Palgrave Macmillan,.
  • Menocal, A. R., Fritz, V., & Lakner, L. (2008). Hybrid regimes and the challenges of deepening and sustaining democracy in developing countriesFootnote. South African Journal of International Affairs , 29-40.
  • Merriam, C. E. (1941). The meaning of democracy. The journal of negro education, 309-317.
  • Muna, W., & Otieno, M. (2020). Voting with the shilling: The ‘Money Talks Factor’ in Kenya’s Public Policy and Electoral Democracy. Journal of African Elections, 92-111.
  • Olawole, O., Adewunmi, E., & Oluwole, E. (2013). Electoral malmpractices and problems in Africa: A critical analysis. Journal of Research and Development, 11-24.
  • Olsson, O. (2009). On the democratic legacy of colonialism. Journal of Comparative Economics, 534-551.
  • Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Urbinati, N., & Warren, M. E. (2008). The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 387-412.
  • US government. (2022, Dec 31). US Embassy Germany. Retrieved from USG: https://usa.usembassy.de/etexts/gov/democracy-elections.htm
  • Warren, M. (1992). Democratic Theory and Self-Transformation. American Political Science Review, 8-23.
  • Wiebusch, M., & Murray, C. (2019). Presidential Term Limits and the African Union. Journal of African Law, 131-160.