Protecting the Best Interests of Children: A Critical Analysis of Child Custody and Divorce Proceedings in Nigeria under the Child Rights Act 2003


Wilson Diriwari

PhD (Brunel University), London) L.L.M. (Lagos State University), L.L.B. (Obafemi Awolowo University), Solicitor (England and Wales). Lecturer in Law. The author accepts full responsibility for any errors or omissions in this paper and welcomes correspondence to wilson@wsolicitors.co.uk

&

Damfebo K Derri

Professor of law. Dean of the Faculty of Law. Niger Delta University Yenagoa, Bayelsa State, Nigeria

DOI – https://doi.org/10.61421/IJSSMER.2023.1403

ABSTRACT

Purpose: This journal article is to analyse child custody and divorce cases in Nigeria emphasising the Child Rights Act of 2003.

Design Methodology/ Approach: This study uses textual analysis including library sources, case studies, and government reports, to examine the difficulties that occur when children’s best interests are not taken into account in the course of custody battles within Nigeria’s legal system.

Findings: It is obvious from the findings of this study that the Child Rights Act 2003, protects the rights and welfare of children during divorce processes. Nonetheless, practices and lack of means make it difficult to implement it.

Original Value: The originality is seen through this paper’s ability to present useful information concerning Nigerian child custody and divorce processes. Moreover, it suggests some ways of improving child custody orders while at the same time implementing the Child Rights Act 2003. In Nigerian culture, this research helps us understand how we can protect children during marital disputes with its attendant problems as well as prospects

Keywords: Child Custody, Divorce proceedings, Child rights, best interests

REFERENCES

  • A Ilodibe S I and Chimeric N G, Review of the Best Interest of a Child’s Custody in Nigeria, International Journal of Advanced Research 2020 8(08), 358-376
  • Kelly J B, The Determination of Child Custody, Children and Divorce 1994, 4(1) 121-142
  • H Government (2018) Working Together to Safeguard Children A guide to inter-agency working to safeguard and promote the welfare of children. Document available at <https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5fd0a8e78fa8f54d5d6555f9/Working_together_to_safeguard_children_inter_agency_guidance.pdf> accessed 27 November 2023.
  • Foua A and Diriwari W Cultural and Legal Perspectives on Child Protection in the Context of Child Trafficking in Nigeria, Beijing Law Review 2020 11(1) 11-33
  • Watkins M et al., Participation in the Court of Protection: a Search for Purpose, International Journal of Mental Health and Capacity Law 2020, No 29, 3-23
  • Agbonika J A, Delay in the Administration of Criminal Justice in Nigeria: Issues from a Nigerian Viewpoint 2014 (26) 130 -138
  • Bruning M R and Doek J E, Characteristics of an Effective Child Protection System in the European and International Contexts, International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice (2021) 4:231–256
  • Sano Y et. al., Well-Being and Stability among Low-income Families: A 10-Year Review of Research, Journal of Family and Economic Issues 2021, 42 ( 1) 107–S117
  • Collison J, Making the best interests of the child a substantive human right at the centre of national level expulsion decisions, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 2020 38(3), 169-190
  • Austin AE et al., Risk and protective factors for child maltreatment: A review. Current Epidemiology Reports, 2020, 7(4) 334-342
  • Anderson J, The impact of family structure on the health of children: Effects of divorce, The Linacre Quarterly 2014, 81(4) 378-87
  • McHale S et al., Sibling Relationships and Influences in Childhood and Adolescence, Journal of Marriage and Family, 2012, 74(5):913-930
  • Jeong J et al., Parenting interventions to promote early child development in the first three years of life: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine 2021;18(5)
  • Henderson-Dekort E et al., The Complex Notion of the Capacity of a Child: Exploring the Term Capacity to Support the Meaningful Participation of Children in Family Law Proceedings, Social Sciences, 2022, 11 (3) 98
  • Frosch C A et al., Parenting and Child Development: A Relational Health Perspective, American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 2021, 15(1): 45–59
  • Forslunde, Attachment goes to court: child protection and custody issues, Attachment & Human Development, 2022, 24 (1)
  • Lee CM, Bax KA. Children’s reactions to parental separation and divorce. Paediatr Child Health. 2000, 5(4) 217-218
  • Emery RE et al., A Critical Assessment of Child Custody Evaluations: Limited Science and a Flawed System. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2005, 6(1) 1-29
  • Muñoz Soro JF et al., A model for predicting court decisions on child custody. PLoS One. 2021, 16(10)
  • Alabi OJ. Perceptions of Surrogacy Within the Yoruba Socio-Cultural Context of Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. F1000Res. 2021 (9)103
  • Azevedo MJ. The State of Health System(s) in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Historical Perspectives on the State of Health and Health Systems in Africa, 2017, Volume II,1–73
  • Schneider C E, Discretion, Rules, and Law: Child Custody and the UMDA’s Best-Interest Standard, The Michigan Law Review Association 1991, 89(8) 2215-2298
  • Nelson CA, et. al., Addressing Child Custody Concerns of Parents with Life-Limiting Illness. Journal of Palliative Medicine. 2020, 23(8):1134-1138.